The Humane World Formula · Work and time
Escape the Rat Race: What Quiet Quitting, Bullshit Jobs and the Four-Day Week Reveal About Work
Monday morning. The alarm, the commute, and somewhere between the first coffee and the first meeting, the question of what all this is actually for. If you ask it, you are neither ungrateful nor weak. You belong to a very large majority. Around the world, most employees have checked out of their jobs, and many think their work is pointless. Yet where companies shorten the week, something surprising happens: the work doesn’t get worse. Often it gets better. Here are the three big buzzwords of today’s working world, what the evidence says about each, and what ties them together.
What is the rat race?
A hamster wheel spins faster the faster the hamster runs, and still the hamster stays in the same place. English has its own name for that kind of life: the rat race, an endless round of working, getting things done and being exhausted that never arrives anywhere. Germans speak of the Hamsterrad, the hamster wheel, and the French of “métro, boulot, dodo”: subway, work, sleep. Three languages, one feeling.
The image says something more. In the wheel, the hamster isn’t the problem. It runs because the wheel is built for running. That is the lens worth bringing to three terms that have been making the rounds in the working world in recent years.

Quiet quitting: resigning in your head
Quiet quitting became a buzzword on social media in 2022. It describes people who don’t resign but only do what their contract says: not one task more than necessary, not one unpaid hour. What was new was mostly the name.
The polling firm Gallup has measured for years how connected employees feel to their work. For 2025 it found that only 20 percent of workers worldwide were truly engaged, the lowest level since 2020. Among managers the figure was 22 percent, nine points lower than in 2022. Gallup estimates that low engagement costs the world economy around $10 trillion a year, roughly 9 percent of global GDP.
You could call it laziness. Something else is more likely: people who quit on the inside are protecting themselves. They have learned that effort goes unnoticed, that doing more only brings more work and that their opinion changes nothing. Then quiet quitting isn’t a flaw of character. It is a sensible response to a badly designed environment.
Bullshit jobs: work no one would miss
In 2013, the American anthropologist David Graeber wrote a short essay about work that seems pointless even to the people doing it. His book Bullshit Jobs followed in 2018. Graeber didn’t mean badly paid or hard work, but positions no one would miss if they vanished: forms no one reads, reports about reports, meetings that decide nothing. A YouGov poll in 2015 had found that 37 percent of British workers believed their job made no meaningful contribution to the world.
David Graeber, Bullshit Jobs
* Links marked with an asterisk lead to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. The price stays the same for you.
Researchers at Cambridge and Birmingham later took a closer look. In the large European Working Conditions Survey of 2015, fewer than 5 percent said their work was rarely or never useful. What stands out is what that feeling depended on: respectful management, support, being able to bring in your own ideas and having enough time to do the job well.
So meaning lives less in the task itself than in the way the work is organized. Even someone who cares for patients can lose it when the paperwork eats more time than the care. And work that plainly helps others can feel empty when no one ever asks how it could be done better.
The four-day week: what the trials show
The best-known answer to the wheel is also the simplest: fewer days for the same pay. Iceland tried it between 2015 and 2019 with about 2,500 public sector workers, who worked 35 to 36 hours a week with no loss of pay. Productivity stayed the same or improved in most workplaces. By 2021, 86 percent of Iceland’s workforce had shorter hours or the right to them.
In the UK, the largest trial yet followed in 2022: 61 companies with about 2,900 employees, for six months. At least 56 kept the four-day week afterward, and 18 made it permanent. Sick days fell by 65 percent, 71 percent of employees reported less burnout, and revenue held steady on average.
In Germany, some 45 organizations tested it for six months in 2024, with researchers from the University of Münster tracking the results. Seventy percent wanted to continue. Participants slept an average of 38 minutes more per week than a comparison group, moved more and were more satisfied with their lives, while revenue and profit rose slightly.
Governments are moving too. Since April 2025, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government has let its employees fit their hours into four days and take one day off every week. Not every experiment works, and not every job can be shortened the same way. But the direction is clear: where work is built around people, instead of people around the work, both sides win.
What ties the three together
Quiet quitting, bullshit jobs and the four-day week look like three separate debates. They tell the same story. The first shows that people pull back when their effort makes no difference. The second shows that meaning depends above all on how work is organized. The third shows that less time in the wheel often means more good work.
Together they disprove an old assumption: that people have to be controlled, pushed and kept busy for anything to get done. That assumption lives in time clocks and targets, in a culture of being seen at your desk and in endless reporting. It is rarely meant badly. It grew layer by layer, out of mistrust. And what people have set up, people can set up differently.
How to get out of the rat race
- Look at your week. For one week, write down where your time really goes. What would anyone miss if it disappeared?
- Talk about it. What one person experiences as a personal failure often turns out, in a group, to be a design flaw.
- Propose an experiment, not a revolution. One meeting fewer, a report you drop, a free afternoon as a test. The results from Iceland, the UK and Germany make good arguments.
- Look for places that are built differently. Cooperatives, companies with a shorter week, teams where having a say is more than a slogan.
- Take the feeling seriously. Getting tired in the wheel doesn’t mean you’re weak. It means you’ve noticed something.
Meaning Jobs: the counter-term from The Humane World Formula
The counter-term to the bullshit job comes from the book The Humane World Formula: the Meaning Job, work where, at the end of the day, you know whom it served. The book devotes a whole chapter to work. It asks what a working world would look like that gives people time back instead of taking it, why Meaning Jobs have counted for so little until now and which tools for the rebuild already exist. The Humane World Formula comes out on April 22, 2027, Earth Day, in nine languages at once.
The book: The Humane World Formula
Sources
Checked on November 5, 2026.
- Gallup: State of the Global Workplace 2026
- YouGov: 37% of British workers think their jobs are meaningless (August 12, 2015)
- Phys.org: One in 20 workers are in “useless” jobs (Soffia, Wood and Burchell, 2021)
- 4 Day Week Foundation: UK pilot results
- CBS News: Iceland four-day workweek trial an “overwhelming success” (2021)
- BASIC thinking: Neue Studienergebnisse zur 4-Tage-Woche (October 22, 2024, in German)
- Tokyo Weekender: Four-day workweek for Tokyo government workers
- Wikipedia: Bullshit Jobs
- Wikipedia: Quiet quitting
